The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

The theory of Cognitive stochasticity states that when individuals ar presented with learning that implies we second in a path that contradicts our moral standards, we experience temper (Aronson, Wilson, and Akert, 1998, P. 191). This is considered Cognitive Dissonance.\n\nA mental term used to list mental skirmish that occurs when beliefs or assumptions argon contradicted by crude information; arouses unease or tension; relieved by peerless of several antiaircraft maneuvers: rejecting, explaining away, or avoiding impudently information; persuading self that no conflict really exists; reconciling differences; or resorting to any opposite protective means of preserving stability or order in construct of world and of self; beginning introduced in 1950s; has sound major point of treatment and research in psychological science (as cited in Comptons synergetic Encyclopedia, 1996).\n\nThis theory was developed by Leon Festinger (1957), is concerned with the relationships among cognitions. Cognition, for the purpose of this theory, may be thought of as a piece of knowledge, thoughts, feelings, or beliefs. Knowledge may be about an attitude, an emotion, a behavior, or a value. For instance, the fact that you exchangeable the color red is cognition. slew have a wide amount of cognitions at the identical time, and these cognitions create irrelevant, relationships with one another. Therefore, that the cardinal cognitions have nothing to do with each other. This occurs most a great deal when we do something that contradicts our moral beliefs.\nIf stochasticity is experienced it is almost invariably uncomfortable, so the individual is motivated to reduce it. This delivers the individual to light upon the magnitude of their discomfort and, it is viable to predict what we can do to reduce dissonance. There are three canonic shipway to reduce dissonance. First are changing cognitions, an example is if two cognitions dont contact we can chang e one to make it relate to the other; or change each cognition in the steerage of the other. The second is adding cognitions, if two cognitions cause a certain layer of dissonance, adding one or to a greater extent cognitions can reduce the item of dissonance. The third is altering importance, attempting to justify the behavior by adding new cognitions. These are the three basic ways of reducing cognitive dissonance (Aronson, Wilson, and Akert, 1998, P. 192).\n\nLeon Festinger and James Carlsmith in addition tested his theory in 1959. They put all the participants through a dull trade union movement. The task consisted in placing a considerable number of spools on pegs...If you emergency to get a all-embracing essay, order it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason why they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty.