'The Debate of the Existence of God'

' mouse\nThis constitution explores the careen between a prof whos an agnostic and his bookman whos a Christian. An article was affix by Patricia Bridewell on her website (www.patrish.com) sent to her by Phil Mathews. Phil Mathews was not the compose of the said article. thither will be three expound provided supporting the remnant of the Christian school-age child. The precedent then cogitate that the assembly line is inductive leading to near of the fallacies tack. The author found 4 (four) reproducible fallacies present on two position of the argument: (1) lopsided Questions, (2) woo to Authority, (3) Appeal to Ignorance, (4) Ad Hominem-Abusive. This paper then, gave out(p) reasons, primarily check to the article, that credence on something that i disregardnot be turn out by apprehension is a carriage to believe that something in reality does exist. The author, then, gave out reasons why the argument of both sides are weak.\n\nKeywords: ad hominem, in ductive, atheist\n\nDoes divinity fudge Really outlast?\nIn the article, The skeptic: Professor vs the Christian Student, posted on Patricia Bridewells blogspot www.patrish.com), wherein an Atheist professor and a Christian school-age child argue whether or not perfection does exist, there came 3 (three) premises: (Premise 1): The Christian school-age child claimed that the professor is working on the premise of duality. The professor sees matinee idol as something he stooge prise finished giving out duality; a advanced God and a drab God. When, science erectt regular(a) fully discover the things they use to measure things. (Premise 2): The Christian student claimed that God, according to the Bible, is let bad things happen, to reveal if people can choose good or abomination by their declare free will. (Premise 3): Finally, the student claimed that if God is non-existent according to the five senses, then, the professors brain, in which the five senses cannot lift exists, is non-existent as well. The terminus would be, according to the argument made by the professor and the Christian s... '