Sources work on the enigma machine.

Question 1:

Study source A. what can you learn about the encounter at Bletchley Park?

We can go steady from the source that everyone was typeset into separate departments, we were very, very departmentalised. The double very emphasises how severely it was done. We can withal learn that their mold was very secretive and guarded, you never discussed your work with whatsoeverone except your little group. The witness comments on how he hadnt a clue what was liberation on in the rest of the park. We also learn that only a very few real high-ups knew everything that was going on. This was intentional; it helped to keep any information from being and abide by to a German spy, which might have been planted at Bletchley Park. This was exaggerated by having to use tubes to send messages, forced by compressed air, from hut to hut. There are no weaknesses in this source. It is a secondary source but was written by an eyewitness.

Question 2:

Study sources A, B and C. does C support sources A and B about the work at Bletchley Park?

Source C clear supports sources A and B.



Source A talks about the seclusion experienced in the Park, Source B comments on how turn in body knew what was happening, none of us knew quite what would happen next, and source C describes the war and how zilch knew whether their efforts had done any good. We can see how much the secrecy is emphasises in these three sources by phrases resembling should think implying that they were not sure they just think. Source A says they never discussed your work which suggests that nobody knew what was going on everywhere, they were ignorant s to the results in any different department. This quotation is supported by one...

If you want to range a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.